Science and innovation looks to re-set the next 20 years, but where’s industry?

Last week’s conference on ‘Re-setting Science and Innovation for the next 20 years’ had a notable element missing – business.

Arranged by the NZ Association of Scientists in collaboration with Victoria University’s Institute of Policy Studies, the one day event had many of the great and good on the science and government side of things. But no business.

Apparently BusinessNZ, the main body now representing a majority of the manufacturers, had been invited, but couldn’t make it. There was no formal representation from the primary sectors or the ICT sector either.

Some of the discussions were about how science and industry often talk across each other. If ever there was a sad indictment of two trains being on different lines and timetables, was this it?

One interesting presentation was by University of Auckland Assoc Professor Rod Dunbar, who is also director of the Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery. He commented on the number of private companies, with a strong R&D element, asking if they can come back and co-inhabit the Centre’s research and office environment. These private companies are missing the buzz and corridor conversations that drive innovation Dunbar says; and he’s attempting to accommodate the companies in what is becoming a sought-after space.

VicLink’s general manager of commercialisation, Sophie Howard, flew a small kite for ‘Open Innovation’. In other words, throwing ideas out to the ether, and asking others (invariably internet-connected) to help with particular problems. It is a trend that’s growing overseas; not without its growing pains, but one that could catch on here if the country gave itself permission to be a bit more permissive with its knowledge.

And finally, about to be Minister of Science and Innovation, Wayne Mapp, gave a breakdown of the government’s current Research, Science and Technology spend. Here are the numbers, as defined by the Ministry
• Primary/Food (includes PGP): $304.2m
• Talent (includes Marsden/HRC): $178.9m
• Hi-Tech/Manufacturing: $146.4m
• General/Infrastructure: $128.5m
• Environment/Risk Management: $90.2m
• Energy/Minerals: $26.5m
• Fundamental: PBRF/CoREs – (Vote Ed): $250m


About sticknz

sticK is by Peter Kerr, a writer for hire. I have a broad science and technology background and interest, with an original degree in agricultural science. My writing speciality is making the complex understandable. I am available for outside consultancy work, and for general discussions of converting a good idea into something positive
This entry was posted in Early stage science, Innovation, Science, Science policy, university and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Science and innovation looks to re-set the next 20 years, but where’s industry?

  1. Graeme says:

    Considering hydrocarbions exploitation and mineral fertiliser dependant Agriculture are two of our three biggest export industries, its quite astounding (and disappontiong) that the research community for Energy/Minerals sector can only muster projects (or support for their projects) to the value of $26.5m, or under 2.5% of the governments RST spend.
    Researching how to efficiently (and sustainably) mine the phosphate nodule deposits off the Chatham Rise alone could open up a domestic industry that would save hundreds of million in diesel-burning transportataion of rock phosphate from North Africa, give our agriculture “security of supply” in a market where demand is rising & Phosphate extraction will peak around 2030 (after which time demand will exceed supply, putting our phosphate-dependant dairy sector at risk). Guarenteed access to our own essential fertiliser materials could be worth countless billions to the country over coming decades as we approach – and pass – “peak phosphate”.
    But how much of the Governments RS&T spend is going into the unique research requirements that extraction of phospate nodules requires? Zip, thats how much……

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s