Take a bow biosciences

A wee while back sticK reported how high tech companies should skite more.

The same can be said for our biological industries (which are also of course high tech).

Because, better late than never, the 2010 Bioscience Industry Report comes with some pretty encouraging news for those making clever use of biology and brains. See the actual report here.

In spite of the global financial crisis (2008) occurring in the middle of the report’s reporting period; 2007-2009, the sector’s shown remarkable growth.

At the same time, the report has taken the opportunity to expand beyond a biotechnology definition – which comes with a bit of implied gene jockeying baggage, whether true or not.

Biosciences is an OECD term – and focuses on primary applications within the bioeconomy (includes animal, foods, and human health, plant and marine), health (includes biomedical science and drug discovery) and the environment (includes bioprocessing and biomanufacturing).

If, using the last report’s biotechnology definition, there had been an additional 45 new companies in the period, while under the biosciences moniker, there were a further 57 organisations.

In all, it reveals that there’s 267 bioscience organisations – growth at a time when worldwide there’s been much contraction.

As the report says, it is difficult to separate out bioscience income and activities from other biological exports, but then it delves into the sector’s entrails, reveals that between the previous report in 2007 and this one, net profit for dedicated bioscience organisations (an estimated 108) has more than tripled to over $121 million.

It also gives a few observations about the industry – one not surprising one being that venture capital in the $5-8 million region is hard to obtain.

But angel investment has been a standout.

The report takes the opportunity to give a swerve to rules around intellectual property, particularly the fact that unlike other investments, the whole of the price of a patent sale (for example) is taxed. The costs of acquiring the knowledge, or legal fees associated with obtaining the patent aren’t taken into account.

All in all, the report’s a nice little reminder that the backbone of New Zealand’s economy has a biological base – and biosciences is the addition of brains to this base.

Sure, we need to be much cleverer about what and how we derive value – be it specific active ingredients, energy (with LanzaTech as the poster child) or the health area.

But, if there’s one thing the report does indicate, it is certainly that a little bit of bragging is due.


About sticknz

sticK is by Peter Kerr, a writer for hire. I have a broad science and technology background and interest, with an original degree in agricultural science. My writing speciality is making the complex understandable. I am available for outside consultancy work, and for general discussions of converting a good idea into something positive
This entry was posted in Angel investment, Entrepreneur, high tech, Innovation, SciBlogs, sustainability, technology and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Take a bow biosciences

  1. Pingback: Labour lobs science and innovation agenda at National – watch out Stephen Joyce! | sticK – science, technology, innovation & commercialisation KNOWLEDGE

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s